Architecture Thursdays: Olson Kundig’s Kinetic Art

Share
Continuing ArchitectureTravelWriter’s three-week series honoring residential architect magazine’s 12th annual RADAs, this post highlights a live/work project by internationally renowned, Seattle-based Olson Kundig Architects.

Photo Credit Benjamin Benschneider, ra magazine

Upon discovering this project, a live/work project in Seattle that ra hailed as a “prototype for the future,” I thought, “This is surely not a return to New York’s Greenwich Village heydays– or of any live/work project that actually allows starving artists to do their thing. It can’t be; Olson Kundig is an expensive architecture firm and no one wants to spend money on good causes like artists.” My optimistic side took hold, though. The Western world today does find itself actually implementing methods and practices used during the first half of the 20th century. But to call these things progressive, to think of them as something new and novel, is well…to have forgotten history.

Nonetheless, let’s eschew debates about verbiage and real estate in favor of the actual design, which took home the biggest RADA of all: Project of the Year.

Photo Credit Benjamin Benschneider, ra magazine

The seven-story mixed use building contains ground-floor retail, parking above, and residences. The building is long and narrow, both of which are essential to sustaining urban density, but it’s also aesthetically appealing. Its textures and materials, ample windows and large sheets of oxidized steel, yield a contemporary and rustic look and feel. Access within the back of each of the five residential unit allows for easy transportation of large art pieces. The front facade illustrates a retrospective appreciation for the past through delightfully operable windows.

Photo Credit Michael Hanson, ra magazine

Guest Blog: A Russian Goes to the Netherlands

Share

By Vlada Tchirikova

I have been living in The Netherlands for about 7 years. I was born and raised in Russia and never traveled abroad before, so NL was my first abroad experience. In Russia, I studied languages– English and French, therefore NL was not even on my list of interest from the linguistic point of view.

When I came here for the first time, everything seemed small and gray (it was winter, and NL is known for its lack of sunshine), but at the same time neat and well-organised. The country’s social security and obscure possibilities to have a better life, became the major reason why I stayed here, despite not being fully adjusted to the unfriendly climate conditions, cultural incompatibilities, repeating sets of general boredom, and feeling of being misplaced and remote from my family and roots. The most honest answer to the question regularly asked either by the Dutch and expats: ‘What are you doing here?’ I usually say: ‘I don’t really know.’

But to be fair and pay the tribute to the country that has more or less accepted me and even allowed me to become a citizen, I will mention below its main pros and cons:

  1. Location: a perfect starting point to explore the neighbouring countries– Belgium, Germany, France. You are also given good offers once you (go) farther to the south– Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal– or the north – Scandinavia, the Baltics.

  2. Language: the Dutch language is horrific but thank God, many people here speak English bearably, less also speak French and German.

  3. Attractions: personally, I am not easily excited about attractions here but it’s understandable: once I was shocked to realise that even people who live near the Sagrada Familia in Barcelona don’t have this deep admiration on their faces while passing it by on a regular, busy day.

  • Amsterdam is a small and overcrowded city, full of old, crammed-on-each-other houses and muddy water canals, and is ruled by hordes of determined bicyclists. It’s a pity that the majority of tourists follow the usual route: the red light street, sex and drug museums, coffee shops, and flower markets. There are much nicer and more authentic places where you can experience the city as the locals do (parks, small side streets outside of the busy city centre, art galleries, and theatres).
  • Utrecht is unfairly not a very popular touristic destination, though the city has much to offer: interesting architecture, broad water canals that host many boats and whose shores accommodate many cafes, bars, and restaurants. The city is vibrant with life due to a great number of students.
  • The city of Rotterdam was bombed to the ground during WWII and was practically built anew, thus it misses an ancient air but can really surprise you by its skyline of a real megapolis. The best time for the visual effect is twilight or at night. Near Erasmus bridge, famous for its bright whiteness, you have an option to take a Speedo boat to reach the other side of the bay, or, if you are not in a great hurry, a pancake boat tour where you can eat a great number of pancakes. In the port, there is a bigger ship called ‘New York’ which is both a restaurant and a hotel.
  • Leiden a university city with its (original) shops and restaurants. You can rent a boat in the outskirts and explore the complicated water canal system, even lakes with luxury houses on the shore, or anchor in small harbours to enjoy a coffee or beer at a cafe onshore.
  • The Hague: I live here, so it’s nothing of interest.
  • Zeeland. Did you know that New Zealand was named after this southern part of the country represented by small islands artificially connected with bridges and protected from the sea by complex dams?
  • Texel is an island on the north of the country famous for its flat fields, sheep, and constant wind.

Vlada is a programme administrator at the Institute of Social Studies. You can contact her through Internations.org.

Media Mondays: DropSend Helps Designers & Writers

Share

For interior designers, architects, photographers, writers, and gracious knows how many other professionals, DropSend repeatedly proves useful. The web site allows easy transferal of one or multiple large files such as photos. It’s easy to use, even for those who aren’t computer-tech savvy.
As a freelance writer who works with photographers, editors, architects, and designers all over the world, I receive and send several large photo files. I’m not tech savvy enough to have discovered a reliable method of compressing these. In fact I’d say it doesn’t exist yet, else why would all of these particular professionals use DropSend?
The site has several account levels. Free, naturally, allows customers to send only a few files each month. I use a $9/month level that allows me to send 45 files and/or store some 10 gigs. You can send individual emails up to 2 GBs. You can store images, too, which especially helps when sending multiple pitches. Memberships are available for larger organizations with multiple users.
Again single or multiple simultaneous uploads are a cinch. They do take a while, mostly because the site sustains the high quality images professional book and magazine publishers require. A simple dialogue box communicates the upload’s process while you’re free to continue working on other things. Speaking of communication, DropSend sends an email to inform users when the file has been picked up.
Here’s how it works.
An architect uploads a dozen or so images, in 300-dpi or higher in a single send file. He can leave a message to accompany the images, though usually through emails I know to expect the files. I don’t have to be a member of DropSend to receive the images, and I wasn’t initially but once I tired of sending these images piecemeal in multiple emails to my editors I recognized the value of membership. I have two weeks in which to download the photos. I download them permanently, write my piece to these photos, then send an editor some I’ve selected to represent the project in a pitch. The editor receives an email containing the images from DropSend. She checks them out with my pitch. She agrees to the story. I write up the entire piece, which I send in my regular email, and send the rest of the images from DropSend.
The whole process is simple and saves abundant time and hassle, especially compare to sending multiple emails of only a few images apiece. Take a tour.
The site has its competitors, to be sure, but none compares.