When American Writers Date Peruvian Artists

Share

An American writer hoping for fun with a Peruvian artist as a horizontal dictionary finds there’s truth in Vicky Cristina Barcelona.

When dating another creative person, the possibility of our following in the footsteps of Joan Didion and John Dunne creeps into my mind. Then just as soon it runs for the hills, howling with laughter as it’s replaced with more realistic images of the notoriously tempestuous match between Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera.
My current exploration of Peruvian men comes at a time of not-so-magical thinking. Age threatens to thicken the wall around my heart, while life fights that instinct by widening my wisdom and travel navigates my experiences. I’m a 37-year-old American born to independence and a strong female character. It’s now that I’m fighting the biggest battle in my life over culture and gender issues. But at least it’s a fun one.

It started innocently enough. While looking for an apartment in Lima I met a tall, attractive, abstract artist whose soft-spoken grace presented a predicament. Rather than get stuck sharing rent with a man who I could possibly love or just as easily loath, I opted instead to familiarize myself with him romantically rather than residentially, the likelihood of a Vicky Cristina Barcelona disaster never far from mind.
Juan Antonio and I debated in Spanish about Jackson Pollack, Klee, and de Kooning over some mota and pisco sours. We watched Julio Medem’s Vacas and “Life Lessons” from New York Stories about love-stricken artists. He turned me into Woody Allen’s Vicky with his intellectual massage. He did not, however, perform like the Don Juan Antonio.
Now here’s where I should have paid attention. Here’s where I should have heeded the sentiment that George W. Bush once butchered but Sex & the City’s Samantha Jones articulated very well: “F*ck me badly once, shame on you; f*ck me badly twice, shame on me.”
“Don’t you have any condoms?” he asks me when our night enters its third act.
I look at him, too mollified to do anything but poorly say in Spanish, “Do you think American women have a practice of keeping condoms in our purse?”
He shrugs and excuses himself to buy the shields at the convenience store downstairs. He returns moments later, as if he’d run, with something called retardantes. I’m thinking it’s a curious word for the object in Spanish but let the event run its course until the retardantes work their lack of magic.
He shows signs of nervousness. I display signs of boredom. We try again.
He shows signs of embarrassment. I display signs of frustration. We call it a night.

Over the next week he keeps my intellect piqued with banter over text messages and emails. He doesn’t have to coerce me back to his apartment the following weekend, though before leaving my own apartment, I do consider coming armed with condoms that don’t retard.
The self-professed “gran pintor” rejects my growing interest in his art. He then insists I pick which of his pieces I’d have in my house. He rejects any discussion I start about American art, in favor of his Euro-centrism. I talk about an architectural tour that took me to the house of Victor Delfin, the Picasso of Peru, and Don Juan calls him a tarado (idiot). He then all but disguises a smirk while pretending to need my assistance in translating an English invitation from Miami’s Art Basel. I’m shaking my head like a cartoon character, trying to remind myself of gender roles when dating fellow creatives.

House & Art of Famous Peruvian Artist Victor Delfin

With a little patience and appreciation that perhaps there’s a culture gap here, too. It pays off. Soon it’s time again for Vicky to read Juan Antonio as her horizontal dictionary.
This time he has condoms unmarked by the loathsome word. We’re good to go…or so I had hoped.
He flopped. I rolled my eyes.
He struck out. I suggested other methods.
He refused. I dressed.

Two weeks later, his text message reads, “Quieres coger?”
“You’ve got to be kidding me. F*ck me badly once…” I want to write back. Instead, I practice a little Joan Didionism and skillfully play dumb. Interpreting his statement not for the Spanish slang it is, “Wanna have sex,” I translate it literally as “to meet up.”
“Sure,” I text him, suggesting we coger at a café where I’ll be later that week, in the middle of the day.
“You want to coger at a café?”
I wait. He becomes more literal. I thwart by continuing clever wordplay in Spanish by saying I prefer tarados to retardantes. He readers between the lines and we bid each other ciao. It wasn’t a divorce or even a knock-down-drag-out fight. It didn’t lead to war or break an engagement, but it’s over.
I’m glad I had the sense not to move into that apartment before inspecting for leaky pipes. I’m also glad I evacuated before having my hand shot, provoking a war, or becoming a drug-addled amputee. At this rate, I have no chance of widowhood leading to a year of magical thinking.
I will remind myself, as I’ve done with musicians and writers, not to tread the path of romance with another creative.

America’s Infrastructure: Progress, Not Politics

Share

Various experts in the space design industry have been telling me for a few years now that shovel-ready projects are too tepid a manner of reigniting America’s infrastructural standing. People are still saying it. (Such as in an Atlantic Monthly piece by Michael Mandel, chief economic strategist for the Progressive Policy Institute.)

I understood what Carol Coletta of Smart City Radio meant when we discussed it at the Chicago Cultural Center in 2009, just weeks before I left the States for China. Today, more than two years later, I’ve witnessed impressive infrastructure in China and Hong Kong and watched as countries like India and the US lag behind.

While many believe it’s a matter of switching to export-based projects, isn’t that bogus? Americans can’t be bothered to be line workers again. An international business man whom I knew in China explained that what’s happening to the world is almost a matter of establishing the next era’s caste system. China and the East will be the manufacturers. Africa will remain trounced upon my developed and developing countries. The West, chiefly America, will dominate on less visible, nonetheless imperative ‘exports’ such as technology.
That’s why it’s necessary that the US build infrastructure based on what’s actually happening, what we’re doing: Internet and eco-friendly travel.
We’re using Internet for everything from Twitter and Facebook to GPS and cell phones. Various parts of the US don’t have reliable Internet connectivity. For instance, at my uncle’s house in very rural Indiana, dial-up connectivity is still prevalent. That means the lack of easy access significantly affects education and other cultural elements that give rise to social democracy.
That’s not to say that manufacturing is completely dead. American automobiles seem to have reached popularity heights not seen since the late 1960s, I noticed when I spent four months back in the States earlier this year. They still enjoy popularity abroad, as I’ve noticed in China, Hong Kong, India, and Peru. It’s only us Americans who complain that they’re not as fuel-efficient as they need to be.
I’ve seen that Americans (and Europeans) care more about fuel efficiency and the very greenness of cars more than any place I’ve visited in the last year. We are the ones leading the planet in hybrids and other alternative energy sources for cars. Fortunately we’re also driving fewer SUVs. However, if we’re to continue leading the charge on this we need more powering sources– not only in cities but also along major highway stretches. If India and Peru can have compressed natural gas pumps at their stations, why can’t the US have ethanol (albeit controversial) and electricity sources at ours?
Consider what other countries are doing, according to this Urban Land Institute report:

      The UK — despite an austerity budget — has committed $326 billion over the next five years for projects related to rail, energy production and broadband access;
      France, Germany and Spain continue to build high-speed rail and freight networks between cities and as extended cross-border links; Australia is focusing on port expansion, rail rebuilding, and traffic congestion relief projects;
      China is funding a host of wide-ranging infrastructure programs, including completion of a 10,000-mile high-speed rail network by 2020. Other projects include new airports, ports and transit systems, all of which contribute to China’s standing as the world’s second-largest economy;
      India is actively seeking private financing for desperately needed infrastructure to sustain growth and meet its economic potential; and
    Brazil is pushing ahead with road, transit and water projects to accommodate its fast-growing economy, and to prepare for upcoming World Cup and Summer Olympics games.

If we’re to continue improving our transportation industry, who doesn’t agree that better public transit is needed amongst and betwixt major cities? Who can’t see that rapid trains are the future, at least for time, cost, and energy savings? Riding China’s fast trains and urban public transit trains so impressed me that it was one of the few times I could actually give the country some credit for gaining all the media hype it does, for causing such competitive concern amongst more developed Western countries. Here’s the rub: these train systems were devised and engineered by Westerners from Germany, the US, England! They’re getting rich making China more efficient whilst governments like the US still shuns funding for major, ameliorative rather than enlarging projects.
“Indeed, China has embarked on the second largest public works program in history, following only the Eisenhower Interstate Highway System in size,” wrote Yonah Freemark on The Transport Politic, an elucidating site about the significant of infrastructure.

Image from The Transport Politic

This is not the time to widen highways; it’s time to evolve. Now is the time to invest in the US. Put money into domestic projects, stop putting it in unwinnable wars in the Middle East. Pay attention to history, for it has a tendency to repeat itself. FDR and Eisenhower gave this country the internal fortitude it needed by domestic funding, not foreign. Or, to appeal to those on the other side of the fence, anyone who’s concerns stem around foreign policy should consider this exactly that: protection of our status, our pride, our energy.
Then there’s just the economics of it. Putting people to work on major infrastructure projects would utilize the country’s rife source of intelligence and spirit of invention. It would also employ people, who go on to spend money in the economy rather than drain it of unemployment and other entitlements.
“What Washington needs is a coherent strategy for infrastructure that goes beyond ‘shovel-ready.’ We need to shift project selection and investment decisions away from a politically-driven process to one that fits our overall economic aims as a country,” Mandel writes.
Where is America’s sense of progress? And how can Americans continue to accept its own hypocritical actions of not wanting war in oil-producing countries yet failing to act fiercely enough to create plans to withdrawal from oil entirely?

Nonfiction & Fiction Writing Require Focus

Share

One of the hardest parts of writing is simply sitting down and writing. Even though I’ve just moved to a new house and have two young children at home, I know that if I don’t spend even just a few minutes a day writing (or some related activity, like planning future chapters of my novel, researching, etc.), I’ll never get anything done.

It took me about six years to finish my first novel, though most of those years were spent simply not doing any work. I would sit down for a few days straight and finish a hundred pages or so. Then stop. A year later, I would read those hundred pages to see what I was doing and work on another hundred pages. Then stop. A year later, I’d… you get the picture. If I had simply spread out that time evenly, I would have had to do much less rereading/restarting, which would have saved many, many hours. In fact, I calculated that I would have saved about 110 hours altogether. Let’s just say that I didn’t make that mistake again.

So, even without kids and a new house, I’m sure you have many distractions and life commitments that keep you occupied. Most people don’t have the luxury of having full day writing/editing sessions, which means focusing on writing itself becomes a difficult chore. With that in mind, I’d like to mention a few of my favourite methods for staying focused on my writing:

1. Get Up Earlier. Even a half hour earlier gives you some quiet time to punch out a few paragraphs and continue the flow of your work. This doesn’t work as well for me when editing as I need more time to get into the groove, but I find that writing (and especially researching) works well in short bursts. One of the important things to remember about getting up earlier is just to write— don’t check e-mail, log into your Google+/Facebook account or see what the weather is like. This time is for writing and nothing else. With kids and my current lifestyle, I prefer getting up earlier, but this idea can work by staying up a little later as well.

2. Plan Ahead. This works well with the point above, since it’s always a good idea to break up large pieces of writing into short, manageable chunks. For example, you can break up a chapter into smaller areas of knowledge/time (or, in the case of fiction, conflict/action) and work on one per day. Try writing these bite-sized ideas on a calendar a week at a time (I prefer a physical calendar on the wall above my desk so that it inspires me throughout the day).

3. Filter. I find it absolutely necessary these days to set up filters in my e-mail program (Thunderbird) so that I only need to focus on the urgent/important e-mails. I’ve taken it to the point where things are now colour coded— red being e-mails sent to my real name address from family and friends or important colleagues, green are e-mails that need to be actioned (moderation on my website’s blog for example), and gray are e-mails that aren’t necessarily spam, but can be safely ignored for some time. The idea of filtering can be moved into the realm of phone calls (which is easy if you have a VoIP system), instant messaging, RSS feeds and other software.

4. Stay Out of the Loop. Unless your writing calls for it, you don’t need to know exactly what’s going on all of the time. Think of it as a personal filter— you don’t need constant updates on Facebook, Google+, Twitter, the news, blogs, etc. Set up a specific time of day to check these so that you don’t cut into your personal and writing time. Or, if you’re on crunch time, then perhaps temporarily cutting yourself off from those will be in order. When editing, I especially find reading the websites that don’t relate directly to my subject as very distracting (and even if you’re like me and you’ll make an excuse as to why that certain blog is important, you need to temporarily let it go… those funny cats will be there next week!).

5. Set Up Your Work Area. This can be both your physical work area (I don’t have a preference, but some like to have a comfy chair and desk or specific coffee shop) and your virtual work area. Both will take some experimentation to find what works for you. The dinner table and a cup of coffee (for morning writing) works fine for me, while software that removes all distractions (Scrivener, WriteRoom, or just a full-screened text editor) is a must. I keep all of my notes on paper and cue cards within a binder as well as electronically so I don’t have any problems with clutter (I’ll just want to clean it instead of writing). Speaking of cue cards, I’ve enjoyed the simple idea of setting up characters and chapters/sections on physical cue cards that are easy to arrange and move around. Sure, software like Scrivener can do that, but quickly rearranging ideas over my dinner table has worked better for me so far.

Those are my top five methods of keeping out distractions and focusing on my writing. In the end, writing won’t happen without your sitting down and writing. So, my favourite methodology is simply: butt-to-seat. Even if your work area isn’t perfect, your filters are going haywire, and you have no plan, you need to simply sit down and work. If it’s just ten minutes to plan out the next few days or an hour to write out a few paragraphs, then that’s a little further then you were the day before and a little closer to your ultimate goal. As Michael Moorcock said in Death is No Obstacle, “Once you’ve started, you keep it rolling. You can’t afford to have anything stop it.”

 

Jason Boudreau is a writer whose blog, www.adadpress.com, provides entertaining insight into publishing and writing.